LDN Social Media
Get connected with us on social networks
This strong evidence of the link between covid vaccines and cancer can no longer be ignored
By Professor Angus Dalgleish
Conservative Woman
April 24, 2024
WE ARE now facing a tsunami of mounting evidence that the mRNA based covid vaccines not only cause cancer progression but also inhibit current treatments in controlling so-called ‘turbo cancers’, sudden and aggressive either first time or relapsed cancers, which are on the rise.
In my recent article about the massive Japanese cancer deaths study that vindicated my warning over covid boosters, I went through the current data that showed how a number of mechanisms set off by the mRNA based covid vaccines could induce cancer, especially after the totally unnecessary boosters. I will not review them in detail again here but merely list them. They are:
1. T cell suppression/exhaustion, especially documented in cancer patients after the first booster;
2. Immunoglobulin class switching from protective IgG1 and 3 to tolerising IgG4;
3. Increase in PD-L1 expression on cells giving protection from immune surveillance;
4. DNA plasmid contamination and inclusion of known oncogenic sequences such as SV40; (Where on this, I ask, is the quality control so beloved by the regulators?)
5. The ability of the spike protein to induce clotting, both micro clots and intravascular clots both of which can enhance cancer spread and metastases;
6. The inclusion of the mRNA stabilizer N1 methyl pseudouridine (m1Ψ) in 100 per cent of samples, leading to melanoma spread in mouse models.
If that was not enough evidence, there is now confirmation of earlier studies that were retracted by the publishers after ‘expressions of concern’ as with this study, SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro, just one example of the unbelievable pressure concerned scientists have been under, that was then used as ‘evidence’ of ‘non-science’. That is to say nothing of the several scientists who could not succeed in getting their papers accepted for publication in the first place, all of which now looks to be very political. A full and up-to-date list of ‘turbo cancer’ and ‘turbo cancer case’ research papers compiled by Dr William Makis – 26 in all and including six this month – which you can see here shows how the literature is growing and how the evidence is mounting by the week. It is no flash in the pan.
Several of these papers had correctly claimed that the spike protein could bind tumour suppressive genes including p53 which is the king of cancer control genes. Now, and finally, the unfair negativity that these reports came in for has been dealt a strong blow by a new preprint from Brown University which confirms these earlier studies. It is entitled SARS2-COV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21 (WAF 1), TRAIL death receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells, and its authors,
Professors Shengliang Zhang and Wafik El-Deiry (the latter is the director of the Legorreta Cancer Centre at Brown University) conclude that this provides a potential molecular mechanism whereby the spike protein can induce tumorigenesis and progression, thus (fatally) protecting the tumour from normally effective standard treatments.
It is worth repeating that the spike protein rarely survives more than 20 days after covid virus infection but has been documented as being present six months and longer after mRNA injections. We also know that inherited deficiencies in normal suppressor genes (p53 and BRCA 1 and 2) lead to early onset of cancers, so this finding has not only short-term but, alarmingly, long-term implications for cancer induction too.
If I was this country’s Chief Medical Officer I would be regarding the detoxification of the spike protein as a national emergency priority. There are many protocols being tried but being ignored by the NHS and other authorities. They should be immediately tested for the ability to eliminate circulating mRNA of the spike protein. Increasing the levels of Vitamin D3 is the only one that everyone agrees on that patients can take to help themselves to reduce the risk immediately. Others such as low-dose naltrexone (LDN) and ivermectin have been reported from several groups as being useful and should therefore be tested immediately as we have the know-how to do this.
Tragically, the resources required to do this are currently being wasted on the ‘spring booster’ programme that can only exacerbate what is an already extremely serious problem.